陈珺, 杨逸, 刘影, 等. 2000—2020年大熊猫自然保护地的生态系统服务功能对土地利用变化的响应[J]. 自然保护地,2026,5(2):1−15. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024081402
引用本文: 陈珺, 杨逸, 刘影, 等. 2000—2020年大熊猫自然保护地的生态系统服务功能对土地利用变化的响应[J]. 自然保护地,2026,5(2):1−15. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024081402
CHEN J, YANG Y, LIU Y, et al. Response of ecosystem service functions to land use change in the giant panda nature reserve from 2000 to 2020[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2026, 5(2): 1−15. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024081402
Citation: CHEN J, YANG Y, LIU Y, et al. Response of ecosystem service functions to land use change in the giant panda nature reserve from 2000 to 2020[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2026, 5(2): 1−15. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024081402

2000—2020年大熊猫自然保护地的生态系统服务功能对土地利用变化的响应

Response of ecosystem service functions to land use change in the giant panda nature reserve from 2000 to 2020

  • 摘要:
    目的 土地利用变化是生态系统服务功能变化的主要因素之一,探究两者的动态关系,对优化大熊猫自然保护地空间布局和加强生态建设与保护具有重要科学意义。
    方法 以四川大熊猫自然保护地(岷山、邛崃山、大相岭、小相岭和凉山山系)为例,根据2000—2020年五期土地利用数据,通过土地利用转移矩阵分析土地利用类型变化过程,利用InVEST模型量化分析2000—2020年间生态系统服务功能(生境质量、碳储存、土壤保持和产水量)动态特征。
    结果 ①2000—2020年四川大熊猫自然保护地的土地利用变化较小,主要以森林、草地和农田为主,但不透水地面面积持续增加。土地利用转移主要为不透水地面对农田、森林和湿地的侵占。②2000—2020年保护地碳储存、土壤保持与产水量功能总体增加,仅生境质量轻微减少,保护地生态系统仍然面临城市化、森林砍伐和人类活动增加带来的压力。③保护地生境质量、碳储存和土壤保持功能的空间分布格局均表现为中部高、四周低,而产水量功能表现为东南低、西北高。
    结论 本研究强调了通过整合土地利用数据与生态模型对保护地生态系统服务功能进行动态监控的重要性,为确定其生态保护与建设目标提供基础,也为其他保护地开展生态系统服务空间评估研究提供重要参考。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives Land use change is one of the main factors affecting ecosystem service function change, and the exploration of the dynamic relationship between these two factors is of significant scientific importance for the optimization of the spatial layout of the giant panda nature reserve and the enhancement of ecological construction and protection.
    Methods In this study, the giant panda natural reserve in Sichuan (Minshan Mountain, Qionglai Mountain, Dxiangling Mountain, Xiaoxiangling Mountain and Liangshan Mountain system) was selected as a case study. Based on the land use data from five periods between 2000 to 2020, land use transfer matrix was used to analyze the change process of land use type. Dynamic characteristics of ecosystem service functions (i.e., habitat quality, carbon storage, soil conservation and water yield) during 2000−2020 were quantitatively analyzed using InVEST model.
    Results The results showed that: (1) A minimal alteration in land use was observed from 2000 to 2020, predominantly forests, grasslands, and farmlands, but with continuous increase in impervious surfaces, primarily encroaching on farmlands, forests, and wetlands. (2) From 2000 to 2020, the carbon storage, soil retention, and water yield functions were generally increased, whereas habitat quality slightly decreased, indicating the ecosystem still faces pressures from urbanization, deforestation, and increased human activities. (3) Habitat quality, carbon storage, and soil retention showed higher values in central areas and lower values in surrounding areas, while water yield exhibited a spatial distribution characterized by a low value in the southeast and a high value in the northwest.
    Conclusions This study emphasized the importance of dynamic monitoring of ecosystem service functions in protected areas by integrating land use data and ecological models, which provided a foundation for establishing the ecological protection and construction objectives of protected areas and also served as a crucial reference for the spatial assessment of ecosystem services in other protected areas.

     

/

返回文章
返回