李滢钰, 孙巧奇, 邹红菲. 自然保护地自然景观评价的研究趋势、方法与展望[J]. 自然保护地,2025,5(3):1−13. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024022806
引用本文: 李滢钰, 孙巧奇, 邹红菲. 自然保护地自然景观评价的研究趋势、方法与展望[J]. 自然保护地,2025,5(3):1−13. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024022806
LI Y Y, SUN Q Q, ZOU H F. Research trends, methodologies, and prospects of natural landscape evaluation in natural protected areas[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2025, 5(3): 1−13. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024022806
Citation: LI Y Y, SUN Q Q, ZOU H F. Research trends, methodologies, and prospects of natural landscape evaluation in natural protected areas[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2025, 5(3): 1−13. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2024022806

自然保护地自然景观评价的研究趋势、方法与展望

Research trends, methodologies, and prospects of natural landscape evaluation in natural protected areas

  • 摘要:
    目的 自然景观评价是运用多学科的知识和方法,对自然景观资源进行系统性、综合性的调查和评估,旨在全面理解其价值与特征及其对人类社会的意义。
    方法 为掌握自然景观评价在我国各类型自然保护地的研究现状,应用文献计量学,系统梳理了从1995—2024年中国知网(CNKI)收录的中文文献,深入剖析了该领域的研究热点和发展脉络,并总结当前自然景观评价的方法及其局限性。
    结果 我国自然景观评价研究经历了初步发展、缓慢增长到现今的爆发式增长3个阶段。研究热点主要聚焦美景度评价、生态旅游资源评价以及景观特征评估等,并广泛开展于城市公园、湿地公园以及国家公园。评价方法多元,且各具特色。然而,通过公众审美、关键词聚类和传统的多因素综合评价方法难以满足全面评估的需求,促使研究者转向构建更为全面、多样化的综合评价体系,如景观特征评估(LCA)和视觉管理系统(VMS)等先进的评估体系,在大中尺度区域景观评估中展现出独特优势。
    结论 今后的研究工作应加强多种评价方法的综合应用,实现评价过程的动态化,积极融入创新技术以推动自然景观评价研究方法不断完善和优化,从而更好地为以国家公园为主体的自然保护地体系服务。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives Natural landscape evaluation is the systematic and comprehensive investigation and assessment of natural landscape resources, with the goal of gaining a comprehensive understanding of the values, characteristics, and significance of these resources to human society via multidisciplinary knowledge and methods.
    Methods In order to gain insight into the current state of research on natural landscape evaluation in China's diverse protected areas, this study employed bibliometrics to systematically organise the Chinese literature included in the China Knowledge Network Infrastructure (CNKI) from 1995 to 2024. This enabled the identification of research hotspots and trends in this field, as well as a summary of current natural landscape evaluation methodologies and their limitations.
    Results The research on natural landscape evaluation in China has gone through three distinct phases: an initial period of development, a subsequent period of slow growth, and a recent period of exponential growth. The research focused mainly on three key areas: the evaluation of the degree of beauty, the evaluation of ecotourism resources, and the evaluation of landscape characteristics in urban parks, wetland parks and national parks. The evaluation methods were diverse and had their own characteristics. However, it was difficult to meet the demand for comprehensive evaluations through public aesthetics, keyword clustering and traditional multi-factor integrated evaluation methods. This has prompted researchers to turn to the construction of a more comprehensive and diversified integrated evaluation system, such as Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), Visual Management System (VMS), and other advanced evaluation systems, which have demonstrated unique advantages in large- and medium-scaled regional landscape evaluation.
    Conclusions Therefore, it is recommended that future research should focus on the integrated utilization of multiple evaluation methods, achieving dynamic evaluation processes, actively integrating innovative technologies to promote continuous improvement and optimization of research methodologies for natural landscape evaluation. This will eventually facilitate the construction of protected areas with national parks as the main body.

     

/

返回文章
返回