李国霞, 苏军德, 赵晓冏. 甘肃祁连山国家自然保护区植物群落多样性与海拔的响应关系[J]. 自然保护地,2024,4(1):110−122. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2023072901
引用本文: 李国霞, 苏军德, 赵晓冏. 甘肃祁连山国家自然保护区植物群落多样性与海拔的响应关系[J]. 自然保护地,2024,4(1):110−122. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2023072901
LI G X, SU J D, ZHAO X J. Response relationship between plant community diversity and altitude in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve, Gansu Province[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2024, 4(1): 110−122. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2023072901
Citation: LI G X, SU J D, ZHAO X J. Response relationship between plant community diversity and altitude in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve, Gansu Province[J]. Natural Protected Areas, 2024, 4(1): 110−122. DOI: 10.12335/2096-8981.2023072901

甘肃祁连山国家自然保护区植物群落多样性与海拔的响应关系

Response relationship between plant community diversity and altitude in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve, Gansu Province

  • 摘要:
      目的  探求祁连山自然保护区植物群落多样性与海拔的响应关系及其驱动机制,为区域森林生态系统的保育和恢复提供一定的理论基础,同时也为区域生物多样性的保护利用及生态建设提供参考依据。
      方法  本研究在野外样方调查的基础上,综合运用除趋势典范对应分析法(Detrended canonical correspondence analysis, DCCA)、相关分析法及回归分析法,对甘肃祁连山自然保护区内(99°30′~100°53′E,38°12′~39°17′N,海拔1 500~3 700 m)植物群落多样性与海拔的响应关系进行了深入分析。
      结果  结果表明:① 不同层次植物群落丰富度指数、多样性指数在不同海拔表现出明显的差异,草本层和灌木层Patrick丰富度指数和Shannon-Wiener多样性指数随环境梯度和海拔梯度均表现出“单峰型”变化格局,除高海拔(2 950~3 700 m)外,在其余海拔梯度上,草本层丰富度指数和多样性指数均显著高于灌木层(P<0.01),且在中海拔(2 400~2 950 m)地带达到最高;② 植物群落各层次Pielou均匀度并未随环境梯度和海拔梯度表现出明显的差异,表明植物群落均匀度受环境响应较小,而主要受群落自身的结构类型和稳定程度的影响;③ 草本、灌木和乔木植被分布格局被环境因子解释部分分别占29.32%,23.24%和9.05%,被空间因子解释部分分别占15.21%,11.08%和7.52%,被空间和环境因子交叉作用的解释部分分别占11.04%、8.42%和5.31%,未被空间因子和环境因子解释部分分别占44.43%,57.26%和78.12%。
      结论  植物群落物种多样性除受海拔引起的水热梯度影响外,还受生物间相互作用、人类活动、发育程度等因素的影响,在未来生态系统的保护与管理中,在减少人类活动影响的同时,应增强应对气候变化的保护措施和力度。

     

    Abstract:
      Objectives  To explore the response relationship between plant community diversity and altitude and its driving mechanism in Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve, and to identify the driving mechanisms behind the relationship. The findings will provide a theoretical basis for the conservation and restoration of the regional forest ecosystem, as well as a reference for the protection and utilization of regional biodiversity and ecological construction.
      Methods  On the basis of field sample survey, Detrended canonical correspondence analysis (DCCA), correlation analysis and regression analysis were comprehensively used in this study. The relationship between plant community diversity and altitude in Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve (99°30′−100°53′E, 38°12′−39°17′N, altitude 1 500−3 700 m) was analyzed.
      Results  The results showed that: 1) The richness index and diversity index of plant communities at different levels showed significant differences at different altitudes. The Patrick richness index and Shannon-Wiener diversity index of the herbaceous layer and the shrub layer showed a “unimodal” change pattern with environmental gradient and altitude gradients, except for high altitudes (2 950−3 700 m). In other elevations, the richness index and diversity index of the herbaceous layer were significantly higher than those of the shrub layer (P < 0.01) and reached the highest point in the middle elevation zone (2 400−2 950 m) zone. 2) The uniformity of Pielou did not significantly differ at each level of the plant community with the environmental and elevation gradients. This suggested that the uniformity of the plant community was less affected by the environmental response and was mainly influenced by the community’s structure type and stability. 3) The distribution pattern of herbaceous, shrub, and tree vegetation accounted for 29.32%, 23.24%, and 9.05% by environmental factors, 15.21%, 11.08%, and 7.52% by spatial factors, and 11.04%, 8.42% and 5.31% by the interaction of spatial and environmental factors, respectively. The proportion of unexplained by spatial factors and environmental factors was 44.43%, 57.26%, and 78.12%, respectively.
      Conclusions  The species diversity of plant spieces within a community was influenced not only by the hydrothermal gradient caused by altitude, but also by biological interactions, human activities, development degree, and other factors. In the future protection and management of the ecosystem, measures must be taken to reduce the impact of human activities, and to strengthen efforts to cope with climate change.

     

/

返回文章
返回